WN1551 Southwest Airlines - Flight Status

Which is the frequency of flight WN1551?
The flight WN1551 is scheduled to flight on daily basis.

Which is the distance of flight WN1551?
The distance between the two airports is 223 miles.

Which is the flight time of flight WN1551?
The scheduled flight time gate to gate is: 01:10 hours.
The real flight time gate to gate on average is: 01:08 hours.

Are the departure airport and arrival airport at the same Time Zone?
Yes, both airports are in the same timezone.

The following airlines serves the same route between Las Vegas and Burbank:

Frontier Airlines
- Flight Number: F91195.

Spirit Airlines
- Flight Number: NK1804. (On Time performance: 100 - Average Delay: 0 minutes)
- Flight Number: NK217. (On Time performance: 100 - Average Delay: 0 minutes)
- Flight Number: NK2300. (On Time performance: 82 - Average Delay: 12 minutes)
- Flight Number: NK2406. (On Time performance: 91 - Average Delay: 6 minutes)
- Flight Number: NK2452. (On Time performance: 91 - Average Delay: 9 minutes)
- Flight Number: NK2454. (On Time performance: 75 - Average Delay: 17 minutes)

Southwest Airlines
- Flight Number: WN1352. (On Time performance: 80 - Average Delay: 13 minutes)
- Flight Number: WN1548. (On Time performance: 84 - Average Delay: 17 minutes)
- Flight Number: WN1553. (On Time performance: 85 - Average Delay: 12 minutes)
- Flight Number: WN1556. (On Time performance: 62 - Average Delay: 23 minutes)
- Flight Number: WN1579. (On Time performance: 80 - Average Delay: 7 minutes)
- Flight Number: WN185. (On Time performance: 77 - Average Delay: 13 minutes)
- Flight Number: WN2209. (On Time performance: 71 - Average Delay: 19 minutes)
- Flight Number: WN2537. (On Time performance: 72 - Average Delay: 26 minutes)
- Flight Number: WN2622. (On Time performance: 82 - Average Delay: 16 minutes)
- Flight Number: WN3129. (On Time performance: 74 - Average Delay: 14 minutes)
- Flight Number: WN3526. (On Time performance: 71 - Average Delay: 19 minutes)

JSX Air
- Flight Number: XE101. (On Time performance: 88 - Average Delay: 10 minutes)
- Flight Number: XE101. (On Time performance: 88 - Average Delay: 10 minutes)
- Flight Number: XE103. (On Time performance: 89 - Average Delay: 6 minutes)
- Flight Number: XE103. (On Time performance: 89 - Average Delay: 6 minutes)
- Flight Number: XE105. (On Time performance: 79 - Average Delay: 12 minutes)
- Flight Number: XE105. (On Time performance: 79 - Average Delay: 12 minutes)
- Flight Number: XE107. (On Time performance: 76 - Average Delay: 15 minutes)
- Flight Number: XE107. (On Time performance: 76 - Average Delay: 15 minutes)
- Flight Number: XE109. (On Time performance: 56 - Average Delay: 22 minutes)
- Flight Number: XE109. (On Time performance: 56 - Average Delay: 22 minutes)
- Flight Number: XE111. (On Time performance: 51 - Average Delay: 40 minutes)
- Flight Number: XE111. (On Time performance: 51 - Average Delay: 40 minutes)
- Flight Number: XE113. (On Time performance: 81 - Average Delay: 14 minutes)
- Flight Number: XE113. (On Time performance: 81 - Average Delay: 14 minutes)
- Flight Number: XE121. (On Time performance: 74 - Average Delay: 19 minutes)
- Flight Number: XE121. (On Time performance: 74 - Average Delay: 19 minutes)
- Flight Number: XE127. (On Time performance: 14 - Average Delay: 18 minutes)

We have gathered data from recent months and present below an analysis of how timely the flights have been.

Delays analyzed by Weekday: We have gathered available data from last six months, spanning from June 15, 2025 to December 14, 2025. Next, you can observe the results broken down by day of the week: number of flights analyzed, on-time performance per day, and average delay per day.

Delays analyzed by Month: We have gathered available data from last twelve closed months, spanning from June 05, 2025 to November 29, 2025. Next, you can observe the results broken down by month: number of flights analyzed, on-time performance per month, and average delay per month.

Note: We have excluded some months from the graph, since the quantity and quality of the data is not representative enough.